Why is it that there seem to be so few self-proclaimed tenant advocates/activists types that actually are inclined to do anything that might be construed as in any way positive or productive?
I find it extremely discouraging.
If the sort of so-called advocates & activists that show up in the Ontario Landlord Association forums are any indication, it's no wonder that the situation - for both landlords and tenants in Ontario - is such a mess.
No respect - not for tenants or landlords. They constantly frame - and speak to - tenants as incompetent infants incapable of taking responsibility or making decisions for themselves. And of course, as far as they are concerned, every single landlord is an evil greedy slumlord. It doesn't matter what we say, they cannot see past their biases & lack of respect.
I understand that people who have never been landlords do not see things the way those of us who have do - in fact, I know that as a tenant, I too was ignorant of the realities of being a landlord. But at least I treated them with respect. And when there was an issue, I talked to them ... funny...I never once had to run to the Legalized Theft Board to resolve an issue (nor did any landlord ever feel the need to serve me with any sort of form/notice/whatever).... but among those who participate in the forums, that is the ONLY possible approach to anything. Name-calling, rudeness, and file with the LTB.
The landlords too sometimes recommend that a tenant who has asked for advice file with the LTB - but very rarely without at least first suggesting that they talk to the landlord directly and attempt to resolve their difficulties. Which is not to say that we are all perfect any more than the tenant uh... ~contributors~ are; many of us are more than a little frustrated & cynical & fed up, and it definitely comes through.... but most of us do try to treat others with respect, and to offer actual advice when it is requested.
It is more than a little discouraging to be constantly attacked no matter what we say.... but more than that, I am discouraged because if these interactions are any indication at all of how ACORN and the other activist/advocacy groups work, the likelihood of any sort of positive or productive dialog happening is slim to none.
People on assistance, people with any sort of disability, and seniors are increasingly going to be discriminated against when it comes to housing in Ontario - and no one seems inclined to do anything to fix that.
It is very unfortunate - especially because it does not need to be this way.
Simple low and no cost fixes ... but hey... what do I know. My solutions tend not to make anyone rich ... must be useless then, huh?
Showing posts with label RTO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RTO. Show all posts
Sunday, 25 August 2013
Discouraged
Labels:
Acorn,
Board,
Brighter Prospects,
Forster,
Frances Lanken,
Landlord and Tenant Act,
Landlord and Tenant Board,
landlord licensing,
ljp,
N5,
NDP,
pennock,
RTO,
tenants from hell,
welfare,
Wynne
Monday, 3 June 2013
Landlord Ordered to Pay Tenant $800K Over Bedbug Infestation
Landlord Ordered to Pay Tenant $800K Over Bedbug Infestation .... ouch!
Am very glad that things are not quite as litigious here in Ontario - being a landlord is plenty challenging enough without having to worry about this sort of thing...
We're fortunate in that we have never had a tenant with bed bugs. Nor are we likely to, since we do a pre-emptive spray each time there is a turnover. I don't understand why more landlords don't do that - especially in rooming homes... so much cheaper and so much less aggravation than waiting until there is a problem.
Anyway .... hubby does treat bed bugs - usually on behalf of landlords, who are required to pay even when this is actually a totally ludicrous requirement.
It makes some sense, I guess, in multi-unit properties and rooming houses... but in single family homes, a bedbug infestation really has nothing whatsoever to do with the landlord.
Even more aggravating is the fact that effective treatment of bedbugs requires that the people who live in the unit cooperate - and many don't.
No skin off their nose if the landlords have to pay for repeated treatments because they don't do - or stop doing - what is needed. And I suppose it's not surprising that people often don't want to let others know they have them - which, unfortunately, all too often contributes to more serious infestations, and contamination of more locations.
In any case, in the Maryland case, it sounds like the landlords were, in fact, remiss, in that they did not ensure the problem was properly dealt with - but more than $800k in damages seems a ~tad~ extreme!
Am very glad that things are not quite as litigious here in Ontario - being a landlord is plenty challenging enough without having to worry about this sort of thing...
We're fortunate in that we have never had a tenant with bed bugs. Nor are we likely to, since we do a pre-emptive spray each time there is a turnover. I don't understand why more landlords don't do that - especially in rooming homes... so much cheaper and so much less aggravation than waiting until there is a problem.
Anyway .... hubby does treat bed bugs - usually on behalf of landlords, who are required to pay even when this is actually a totally ludicrous requirement.
It makes some sense, I guess, in multi-unit properties and rooming houses... but in single family homes, a bedbug infestation really has nothing whatsoever to do with the landlord.
Even more aggravating is the fact that effective treatment of bedbugs requires that the people who live in the unit cooperate - and many don't.
No skin off their nose if the landlords have to pay for repeated treatments because they don't do - or stop doing - what is needed. And I suppose it's not surprising that people often don't want to let others know they have them - which, unfortunately, all too often contributes to more serious infestations, and contamination of more locations.
In any case, in the Maryland case, it sounds like the landlords were, in fact, remiss, in that they did not ensure the problem was properly dealt with - but more than $800k in damages seems a ~tad~ extreme!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)